<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 247</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 160</number>
  <date>1711-12-13</date>
  <author>Joseph Addison</author>
  <quotation>--------&#932;&#969;&#957; &#948;&#39; &#945;&#922;&#945;&#956;&#945;&#964;&#959;&#962; &#961;&#949;&#949;&#953; &#945;&#965;&#948;&#951;</quotation>
  <quotation>&#39;&#917;&#954; &#963;&#964;&#959;&#956;&#945;&#964;&#969;&#957; &#951;&#948;&#949;&#953;&#945;---------Hesiod.</quotation>
  <translation>Hesiod, Theogonia, 39-40.</translation>
  <translation>Their untired lips a wordy torrent pour.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>WE are told by some antient Authors, that <italic>Socrates</italic> was instructed
in Eloquence by a Woman, whose Name, if I am not mistaken, was
<italic>Aspasia.</italic> I have indeed very often looked upon that Art as the most
proper for the Female Sex, and I think the Universities would do
well to consider whether they should not fill the Rhetorick Chairs
with She Professors.</paragraph>
<paragraph>It has been said in the Praise of some Men,
that they could Talk whole Hours together upon any Thing; but it
must be owned to the Honour of the other Sex, that there are many
among them who can Talk whole Hours together upon Nothing. I have
known a Woman branch out into along Extempore Dissertation upon the
Edging of a Petticoat, and chide her Servant for breaking a China
Cup, in all the Figures of Rhetorick.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Were Women admitted to plead
in Courts of Judicature, I am perswaded they would carry the
Eloquence of the Bar to greater Heights than it has yet arrived at.
If anyone doubts this, let him but be present at those Debates
which frequently arise among the Ladies [of the<footnote name="(1)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote247.xml"></footnote>] <italic>British</italic>
Fishery.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The first Kind therefore of Female Orators which I shall
take notice of, are those who are employed in stirring up the
Passions, a Part of Rhetorick in which Socrates his Wife had
perhaps made a greater Proficiency than his above-mentioned
Teacher.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The second Kind of Female Orators are those who deal in
Invectives, and who are commonly known by the Name of the
Censorious. The Imagination and Elocution of this Set of
Rhetoricians is wonderful. With what a Fluency of Invention, and
Copiousness of Expression, will they enlarge upon every little Slip
in the Behaviour of another? With how many different Circumstances,
and .with what Variety of Phrases, will they tell over the same
Story? I have known an old Lady make an unhappy Marriage the
Subject of a Month's Conversation. She blamed the Bride in one
Place; pitied her in another; laughed at her in a third; wondered
at her in a fourth; was angry with her in a fifth; and in short,
wore out a Pair of Coach-Horses in expressing her Concern for her.
At length, after having quite exhausted the Subject on this Side,
she made a Visit to the new-married Pair, praised the Wife for the
prudent Choice she had made, told her the unreasonable Reflections
which some malicious People had cast upon her, and desired that
they might be better acquainted. The Censure and Approbation of
this Kind of Women are therefore only to be consider'd as Helps to
Discourse.</paragraph>
<paragraph>A third Kind of Female Orators may be comprehended under
the Word <italic>Gossips.</italic> Mrs. <italic>Fiddle Faddle</italic> is perfectly accomplished in
this Sort of Eloquence; she launches out into Descriptions of
Christenings, runs Divisions upon an Headdress, knows every Dish of
Meat that is served up in her Neighbourhood, and entertains her
Company a whole Afternoon together with the Wit of her little Boy,
before he is able to speak.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The Coquet may be looked upon as a
fourth Kind of Female Orator. To give her self the larger Field for
Discourse, she hates and loves in the same Breath, talks to her
Lap-dog or Parrot, is uneasy in all kinds of Weather, and in every
Part of the Room: She has false Quarrels and feigned Obligations to
all the Men of her Acquaintance; sighs when she is not sad, and
Laughs when she is not Merry. The Coquet is in particular a great
Mistress of that Part of Oratory which is called Action, and indeed
seems to speak for no other Purpose, but as it gives her an
Opportunity of stirring a Limb, or varying a Feature, of glancing
her Eyes, or playing with her Fan.</paragraph>
<paragraph>As for News-mongers,
Politicians, Mimicks, Story-Tellers, with other Characters of that
nature, which give Birth to Loquacity, they are as commonly found
among the Men as the Women; for which Reason I shall pass them over
Silence.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I have often been puzzled to assign a Cause why Women
should have this Talent of a ready Utterance in so much greater
Perfection than Men. I have sometimes fancied that they have not a
retentive Power, or the Faculty of suppressing their Thoughts, as
Men have, but that they are necessitated to speak every Thing they
think, and if so, it would perhaps furnish a very strong Argument
to the <italic>Cartesians,</italic> for the supporting of their [Doctrine,<footnote name="(2)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote247.xml"></footnote>] that
the Soul always thinks. But as several are or Opinion that the Fair
Sex are not altogether Strangers to the Art of Dissembling and
concealing their Thoughts, I have been forced to relinquish that
Opinion, and have therefore endeavoured to seek after some better
Reason. In order to it, a Friend of mine, who is an excellent
Anatomist, has promised me by the first Opportunity to dissect a
Woman's Tongue, and to examine whether there may not be in it
certain Juices which render it so wonderfully voluble [or<footnote name="(3)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote247.xml"></footnote>]
flippant, or whether the Fibres of it may not be made up of a finer
or more pliant Thread, of whether there are not in it some
particular Muscles which dart it up and down by such sudden Glances
and Vibrations; or whether in the last Place, there may not be
certain undiscovered Channels running from the Head and the Heart,
to this little Instrument of Loquacity, and conveying into it a
perpetual Affluence of animal Spirits. Nor must I omit the Reason
which <italic>Hudibras</italic> has given, why those who can talk on Trifles speak
with the greatest Fluency; namely, that the Tongue is like a
Race-Horse, which runs the faster the lesser Weight it carries.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Which of these Reasons soever may be looked upon as the most
probable, I think the <italic>Irishman's</italic> Thought was very natural, who
after some Hours Conversation with a Female Orator, told her, that
he believed her Tongue was very glad when she was asleep, for that
it had not a Moment's Rest all the while she was awake.</paragraph>
<paragraph>That excellent old Ballad of The <italic>Wanton Wife of Bath</italic> has the following
remarkable Lines.</paragraph>
<quotation><italic>I think, quoth</italic> Thomas, <italic>Womens Tongues</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Of Aspen Leaves are made.</italic></quotation>
<paragraph>And <italic>Ovid,</italic> though in the Description of a very
barbarous Circumstance, tells us, That when the Tongue of a
beautiful Female was cut out, and thrown upon the Ground, it could
not forbear muttering even in that Posture.</paragraph>
<quotation><italic>---Comprensam forcipe linguam</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Abstulit ense fero. Radix micat ultima lingu&#230;.</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Ipsa jacet, terraeque tremens immumurat atr&#230;;</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Utque salire solet mutilatae cauda colubre</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Palpitat:------------</italic><footnote name="(4)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote247.xml"></footnote></quotation>
<paragraph>If a tongue would be
talking without a Mouth, what could it have done when it had all
its Organs of Speech, and Accomplices of Sound about it? I might
here mention the Story of the Pippin-Woman, had not I some Reason
to look upon it as fabulous.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I must confess I am so wonderfully
charmed with the Musick of this little Instrument, that I would by
no Means discourage it. All that I aim at by this Dissertation is,
to cure it of several disagreeable Notes, and in particular of
those little Jarrings and Dissonances which arise from Anger,
Censoriousness, Gossiping and Coquetry. In short, I would always
have it tuned by Good-Nature, Truth, Discretion and Sincerity.</paragraph>
<paragraph>C.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. [that belong to our]</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. [Opinion,]</paragraph>
<paragraph>3. [and]</paragraph>
<paragraph>4. Met. I. 6, v. 556.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
