<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 249</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 249</number>
  <date>1711-12-15</date>
  <author>Joseph Addison</author>
  <quotation>&#915;&#949;&#955;&#969;&#962; &#945;&#954;&#945;&#953;&#961;&#959;&#962; &#949;&#957; &#914;&#961;&#959;&#964;&#959;&#953;&#962; &#948;&#949;&#957;&#959;&#957; &#954;&#945;&#954;&#959;&#957;.------Frag. Vet. Poet.</quotation>
  <translation>Frag. Vet. Poet.</translation>
  <translation>Menander, Monostichoi, 88.</translation>
  <translation>Mirth out of season is a grievous ill.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>WHEN I make Choice of a Subject that has not
been treated on by others, I throw together my Reflections on it
without any Order or Method, so that they may appear rather in the
Looseness and Freedom of an Essay, than in the Regularity of a Set
Discourse. It is after this Manner that I shall consider Laughter
and Ridicule in my present Paper.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Man is the merriest Species of
the Creation, all above and below him are Serious. He sees things
in a different Light from other Beings, and finds his Mirth [a]
rising from Objects that perhaps cause something like Pity or
Displeasure in higher Natures. Laughter is indeed a very good
Counterpoise to the Spleen; and it seems but reasonable that we
should be capable of receiving Joy from what is no real Good to us,
since we can receive Grief from what is no real Evil.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I have in my Forty-seventh Paper raised a Speculation on the Notion of a Modern
Philosopher;<footnote name="(1)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote249.xml"></footnote>
who describes the first Motive of Laughter to be a
secret Comparison which we make between our selves, and the Persons
we laugh at; or, in other Words, that Satisfaction which we receive
from the Opinion of some Pre-eminence in our selves, when we see
the Absurdities of another or when we reflect on any past
Absurdities of our own. This seems to hold in most Cases, and we
may observe that the vainest Part of Mankind are the most addicted
to this Passion.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I have read a Sermon of a Conventual in the Church
of <italic>Rome,</italic> on those Words of the Wise Man, <italic>I said of Laughter, it is
mad; and of Mirth, what does it?</italic> Upon which he laid it down as a
Point of Doctrine, that Laughter was the Effect of Original Sin,
and that <italic>Adam</italic> could not laugh before the Fall.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Laughter, while it lasts, slackens and unbraces the Mind, weakens the Faculties, and
causes a kind of Remissness and Dissolution in all the Powers of
the Soul: And thus far it may be looked upon as a Weakness in the
Composition of Human Nature. But if we consider the frequent
Reliefs we receive from it, and how often it breaks the Gloom which
is apt to depress the Mind and damp our Spirits, with transient
unexpected Gleams of Joy, one would take care not to grow too Wise
for so great a Pleasure of Life.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The Talent of turning Men into
Ridicule, and exposing to Laughter those one converses with, is the
Qualification of little ungenerous Tempers. A young Man with this
Cast of Mind cuts himself off from all manner of Improvement.
Everyone has his Flaws and Weaknesses; nay, the greatest Blemishes,
are often found in the most shining Characters; but what an absurd
Thing is it to pass over all the valuable Parts of a Man, and fix
our Attention on his Infirmities? to observe his Imperfections more
than his Virtues; and to make use of him for the Sport of others,
rather than for our own Improvement?</paragraph>
<paragraph>We therefore very often find,
that Persons the most accomplished in Ridicule are those who are
very shrewd at hitting a Blot, without exerting any thing masterly
in themselves. As there are many eminent Criticks who never writ a
good Line, there are many admirable Buffoons that animadvert upon
every single Defect in another, without ever discovering the least
Beauty or their own. By this Means, these unlucky little Wits often
gain Reputation in the Esteem of Vulgar Minds, and raise themselves
above Persons of much more laudable Characters.</paragraph>
<paragraph>If the Talent of Ridicule were employed to laugh Men out of Vice and Folly, it might
be of some Use to the World; but instead of this, we find that it
is generally made use of to laugh Men out of Virtue and good Sense,
by attacking every thing that is Solemn and Serious, Decent and
Praiseworthy in Human Life.</paragraph>
<paragraph>We may observe, that in the First Ages
of the World, when the great Souls and Master-pieces of Human
Nature were produced, Men shined by a noble Simplicity of
Behaviour, and were Strangers to those little Embellishments which
are so fashionable in our present Conversation. And it is very
remarkable, that notwithstanding we fall short at present of the
Ancients in Poetry, Painting, Oratory,. History, Architecture, and
all the noble Arts and Sciences which depend more upon Genius than
Experience, we exceed them as much in Doggerel, Humour, Burlesque,
and all the trivial Arts of Ridicule. We meet with more Raillery
among the Moderns, but more Good Sense among the Ancients.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The two great Branches of Ridicule in Writing are Comedy and Burlesque. The
first ridicules Persons by drawing them in their proper Characters,
the other by drawing them quite unlike themselves. Burlesque is
therefore of two kinds; the first represents mean Persons in the
Accoutrements of Heroes, the other describes great Persons acting
and speaking like the basest among the People. <italic>Don Quixote</italic> is an
Instance of the first, and <italic>Lucian's</italic> Gods of the second. It is a
Dispute among the Criticks, whether Burlesque Poetry runs best in
Heroick Verse, like that of the<italic> Dispensary;</italic><footnote name="(2)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote249.xml"></footnote> or in Doggerel,
like that of <italic>Hudibras.</italic> I think where the low Character is to be
raised, the Heroick is the proper Measure; but when an Hero is to
be pulled down and degraded, it is done best in Doggerel.</paragraph>
<paragraph>If <italic>Hudibras</italic> had been set out with as much Wit and Humour in Heroick
Verse as he is in Doggerel, he would have made a much more
agreeable Figure than he does; though the generality of his Readers
are so wonderfully pleased with the double Rhimes, that I do not
expect many will be of my Opinion in this Particular.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I shall conclude this Essay upon Laughter with observing that the Metaphor
of Laughing, applied to Fields and Meadows when they are in Flower,
or to Trees when they are in Blossom, runs through all Languages;
which I have not observed of any other Metaphor, excepting that of
Fire and Burning when they are applied to Love. This shews that we
naturally regard Laughter, as what is in it self both amiable and
beautiful. For this Reason likewise <italic>Venus</italic> has gained the Title of
[&#934;&#953;&#955;&#959;&#956;&#949;&#953;&#948;&#951;&#962;,]
the Laughter-loving Dame, as <italic>Waller</italic> has
Translated it, and is represented by <italic>Horace</italic> as the Goddess who
delights in Laughter. <italic>Milton,</italic> in a joyous Assembly of imaginary
Persons,<footnote name="(3)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote249.xml"></footnote> has given us a very Poetical Figure of Laughter. His
whole Band of Mirth is so finely described, that I shall [set<footnote name="(4)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote249.xml"></footnote>]
down [the Passage] at length.</paragraph>
<quotation><italic>But come thou Goddess fair and free,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>In Heaven ylcleped Euphrosyne,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>And by Men, heart-easing Mirth,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Whom lovely</italic> Venus <italic>at a Birth,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>With two Sister Graces more,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>To Ivy-crowned</italic> Bacchus <italic>bore:</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Haste thee, Nymph, and bring with thee</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Jest and youthful Jollity,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Quips and Cranks, and wanton Wiles,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Nods, and Becks, and wreathed Smiles,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Such as hang on</italic> Hebe's <italic>Cheek,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>And love to live in Dimple sleek:</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Sport that wrinkled Care derides,</italic></quotation>
<quotation>And Laughter holding both his Sides.</quotation>
<quotation><italic>Come, and trip it, as you go,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>On the light fantastick Toe:</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>And in thy right Hand lead with thee</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>The Mountain Nymph, sweet Liberty;</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>And if I give thee Honour due,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>Mirth, admit me of thy Crew,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>To live with her, and live with thee,</italic></quotation>
<quotation><italic>In unreproved Pleasures free.</italic></quotation>
<paragraph>C.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. Hobbes.</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. Sir Samuel Garth, poet and physician, who was alive at this time (died in 1719),
satirized a squabble among the doctors in his poem of <italic>the Dispensary.</italic>

<quotation><italic>The piercing Caustics ply their spiteful Pow'r;</italic></quotation>

<quotation><italic>Emetics ranch, and keen Cathartics scour.</italic></quotation>

<quotation><italic>The deadly Drugs in double Doses fly;</italic></quotation>

<quotation><italic>And Pestles peal a martial Symphony.</italic></quotation></paragraph>
<paragraph>3. L'Allegro.</paragraph>
<paragraph>4. [set it]</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
