<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 252</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 252</number>
  <date>1711-12-19</date>
  <author>Richard Steele</author>
  <quotation>[Erranti, passimque oculos per cuncta ferenti.---Virg .<footnote name="(1)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote252.xml"></footnote>]</quotation>
  <translation>Virg. &#198;n. ii. 570.</translation>
  <translation>Exploring every place with curious eyes.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph><italic>Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,</paragraph>
<paragraph>I AM very sorry to find by your Discourse upon the Eye, that you have not
thoroughly studied the Nature and Force of that Part of a beauteous
Face. Had you ever been in love, you would have said ten thousand
things, which it seems did not occur to you: Do but reflect upon
the Nonsense it makes Men talk, the Flames which it is said to
kindle, the Transport it raises, the Dejection it causes in the
bravest Men; and if you do believe those things are expressed to an
Extravagance, yet you will own, that the Influence of it is very
great which moves Men to that Extravagance. Certain it is, that the
whole Strength of the Mind is sometimes seated there; that a kind
Look imparts all, that a Year's Discourse could give you, in one
Moment. What matters it what she says to you, see how she looks, is
the Language of all who know what Love is. When the Mind is thus
summed up and expressed in a Glance, did you never observe a sudden
Joy arise in the Countenance of a Lover? Did you never see the
Attendance of Years paid, over-paid in an Instant? You a SPECTATOR,
and not know that the Intelligence of Affection is carried on by
the Eye only; that Good-breeding has made the Tongue falsify the
Heart, and act a Part of continual Constraint, while Nature has
preserved the Eyes to her self, that she may not be disguised or
misrepresented. The poor Bride can give her Hand, and say, <italic>I do,</italic>
with a languishing Air, to the Man she is obliged by cruel Parents
to take for mercenary Reasons, but at the same Time she cannot look
as if she loved; her Eye is full of Sorrow, and Reluctance sits in
a Tear, while the Offering of the Sacrifice is performed in what we
call the Marriage Ceremony. Do you never go to Plays? Cannot you
distinguish between the Eyes of those who go to see, from those who
come to be seen? I am a Woman turned of Thirty, and am on the
Observation a little; therefore if you or your Correspondent had
consulted me in your Discourse on the Eye, I could have told you
that the Eye of <italic>Leonora</italic> is slyly watchful while it looks negligent:
she looks round her without the Help of the Glasses you speak of,
and yet seems to be employed on Objects directly before her. This
Eye is what affects Chance-medley, and on a sudden, as if it
attended to another thing, turns all its Charms against an Ogler.
The Eye of <italic>Lusitania</italic> is an Instrument of premeditated Murder; but
the Design being visible, destroys the Execution of it; and with
much more Beauty than that of <italic>Leonora,</italic> it is not half so
mischievous. There is a brave Soldier's Daughter in Town, that by
her Eye has been the Death of more than ever her Father made fly
before him. A beautiful Eye makes Silence eloquent, a kind Eye
makes Contradiction an Assent, an enraged Eye makes Beauty
deformed. This little Member gives Life to every other Part about
us, and I believe the Story of <italic>Argus</italic> implies no more than that the
Eye is in every Part, that is to say, every other Part would be
mutilated, were not its Force represented more by the Eye than even
by it self. But this is Heathen <italic>Greek</italic> to those who have not
conversed by Glances. This, Sir, is a Language in which there can
be no Deceit, nor can a Skilful Observer be imposed upon by Looks
even among Politicians and Courtiers. If you do me the Honour to
print this among your Speculations, I shall in my next make you a
Present of Secret History, by Translating all the Looks of the next
Assembly of Ladies and Gentlemen into Words, to adorn some future
Paper. I am,</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>SIR,</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Your faithful Friend,</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>Mary Heartfree.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Dear Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,</paragraph>
<paragraph>I have a Sot of a Husband that lives a very scandalous
Life, and wastes away his Body and Fortune in Debaucheries; and is
immoveable to all the Arguments I can urge to him. I would gladly
know whether in some Cases a Cudgel may not be allowed as a good
Figure of Speech, and whether it may not be lawfully used by a
Female Orator.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Your humble Servant,</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>Barbara Crabtree.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,<footnote name="(2)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote252.xml"></footnote></paragraph>
<paragraph>Though I am a Practitioner m the Law of some
standing, and have heard many eminent Pleaders in my Time, as well
as other eloquent Speakers of both Universities, yet I agree with
you, that. Women are better qualified to succeed in Oratory than
the Men, and believe this is to be resolved into natural Causes.
You have mentioned only the Volubility of their Tongue; but what do
you think of the silent Flattery of their pretty Faces, and the
Perswasion which even an insipid Discourse carries with it when
flowing from beautiful Lips, to which it would be cruel to deny any
thing? It is certain too, that they are possessed of some Springs
of Rhetorick which, Men want, such as Tears, fainting Fits, and the
like, which I have seen employed upon Occasion with good Success.
You must know I am a plain Man and love my Money; yet I have a
Spouse who is so great an Orator in this Way, that she draws from
me what Sum she pleases. Every Room in my House is furnished with
Trophies of her Eloquence, rich Cabinets, Piles of China, Japan
Screens, and costly Jars; and if you were to come into my great
Parlour, you would fancy your self in an <italic>India</italic> Ware-house: Besides
this she keeps a Squirrel, and I am doubly taxed to pay for the
China he breaks. She is seized with periodical Fits about the Time
of the Subscriptions to a new Opera, and is drowned in Tears after
having seen any Woman there in finer Cloaths than herself: These
are Arts of Perswasion purely Feminine, and which a tender Heart
cannot resist. What I would therefore desire of you, is, to prevail
with your Friend who has promised to dissect a Female Tongue, that
he would at the same time give us the Anatomy of a Female Eye, and
explain the Springs and Sluices which feed it with such ready
Supplies of Moisture; and likewise shew by what means, if possible,
they may be stopped at a reasonable Expence: Or, indeed, since
there is something so moving in the very Image of weeping Beauty,
it would be worthy his Art to provide, that these eloquent Drops
may no more be lavished on Trifles, or employed as Servants to
their wayward wins; but reserved for serious Occasions in Life, to
adorn generous Pity, true Penitence, or real Sorrow.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>I am,</italic> &#38;c.</paragraph>
<paragraph>T.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. [<italic>Nescio quis Teneros oculus mihi fascinat Agnos.</italic>---Virg.]</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. This letter is by John Hughes.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
