<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 259</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 259</number>
  <date>1711-12-27</date>
  <author>Richard Steele</author>
  <quotation>Quod decet honestum est, et quod honestum est decet.- Tull.</quotation>
  <translation>Tull. De Officiis, Liber Primus, 94.</translation>
  <translation>What is becoming is honourable, and what is honourable is becoming.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>THERE are some Things which
cannot come under certain Rules, but which one would think could
not need them. Of this kind are outward Civilities and Salutations.
These one would imagine might be regulated by every Man's Common
Sense without the Help of an Instructor; but that which we call
Common Sense suffers under that Word; for it sometimes implies no
more than that Faculty which is common to all Men, but sometimes
signifies right Reason, and what all Men should consent to. In this
latter Acceptation of the Phrase, it is no great Wonder People err
so much against it, since it is not everyone who is possessed of
it, and there are fewer, who against common Rules and Fashions,
dare obey its Dictates. As to Salutations, which I was about to
talk of, I observe as I strole about Town, there are great
Enormities committed with regard to this Particular. You shall
sometimes see a Man begin the Offer of a Salutation, and observe a
forbidding Air, or escaping Eye, in the Person he is going to
salute, and stop short in the Pole of his Neck. This in the Person
who believed he could do it with a good Grace, and was refused the
Opportunity, is justly resented with a Coldness the whole ensuing
Season. Your great Beauties, People in much Favour, or by any Means
or for any Purpose overflattered, are apt to practise this which
one may call the preventing Aspect, and throw their Attention
another Way, lest they should confer a Bow or a Curtsie upon a
Person who might not appear to deserve that Dignity. Others you
shall find so obsequious, and so very courteous, as there is no
escaping their Favours of this Kind. Of this Sort may be a Man who
is in the fifth or sixth Degree of Favour with a Minister; this
good Creature is resolved to shew the World, that great Honours
cannot at all change his Manners; he is the same civil Person he
ever was; he will venture his Neck to bow out of a Coach in full
Speed, at once, to shew he is full of Business, and yet is not so
taken up as to forget his old Friend. With a Man, who is not so
well formed for Courtship and elegant Behaviour, such a Gentleman
as this seldom finds his Account in the Return of his Compliment,
but he will still go on, for he is in his own Way, and must not
omit; let the Neglect fall on your Side, or where it will, his
Business is still to be well-bred to the End. I think I have read,
in one of our <italic>English</italic> Comedies, a Description of a Fellow that
affected knowing every Body, and for Want of Judgment in Time and
Place, would bow and smile in the Face of a Judge sitting in the
Court, would sit in an opposite Gallery and smile in the Minister's
Face as he came up into the Pulpit, and nod as if he alluded to
some Familiarities between them in another Place. But now I happen
to speak of salutation at Church, I must take notice that several
of my Correspondents have importuned me to consider that Subject,
and settle the Point of Decorum in that Particular.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I do not pretend to be the best Courtier in the World, but I have often on
publick Occasions thought it a very great Absurdity in the Company
(during the Royal Presence) to exchange Salutations from all Parts
of the Room, when certainly Common Sense should suggest, that all
Regards at that Time should be engaged, and cannot be diverted to
any other Object, without Disrespect to the Sovereign. But as to
the Complaint of my Correspondents, it is not to be imagined what
Offence some of them take at the Custom of Saluting in Places of
Worship. I have a very angry Letter from a Lady, who tells me [of]
one of her Acquaintance, [who,] out of meer Pride and a Pretence to
be rude, takes upon her to return no Civilities done to her in Time
of Divine Service, and is the most religious Woman for no other
Reason but to appear a Woman of the best Quality in the Church.
This absurd Custom had better be abolished than retained, if it
were but to prevent Evils of no higher a Nature than this is; but I
am informed of Objections much more considerable: A Dissenter of
Rank and Distinction was lately prevailed upon by a Friend of his
to come to one of the greatest Congregations of the Church of
<italic>England</italic> about Town: After the Service was over, he declared he was
very well satisfied with the little Ceremony which was used towards
God Almighty; but at the same time he feared he should not be able
to go through those required towards one another: As to this Point
he was in a State of Despair, and feared he was not well-bred
enough to be a Convert. There have been many Scandals of this Kind
given to our Protestant Dissenters from the outward Pomp and
Respect we take to our selves in our Religious Assemblies. A Quaker
who came one Day into a Church, fixed his Eyes upon an old Lady
with a Carpet larger than that from the Pulpit before her,
expecting when she would hold forth. An Anabaptist who designs to
come over himself, and all his Family, within few Months, is
sensible they want Breeding enough for our Congregations, and has
sent his two [eldest<footnote name="(1)" url="../december_footnotes/footnote259.xml"></footnote>]
Daughters to learn to dance, that they
may not misbehave themselves at Church: It is worth considering
whether, in regard to awkward People with scrupulous Consciences, a
good Christian of the best Air in the World ought not rather to
deny herself the Opportunity; of shewing so many Graces, than keep
a bashful Proselyte without the Pale of the Church.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. [elder]</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
