<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 236</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 236</number>
  <date>1711-11-30</date>
  <author>Richard Steele</author>
  <quotation>-----Dare Jura maritis.-----Hor.</quotation>
  <translation>Hor. Ars Poet. v. 398.</translation>
  <translation>With laws connubial tyrants to restrain.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph><italic>Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,</paragraph>
<paragraph>YOU have not spoken in so direct a
manner upon the Subject of Marriage as that important Case
deserves. It would not be improper to observe upon the Peculiarity
in the Youth of <italic>Great Britain,</italic> of railing and laughing at that
Institution; and when they fall into it, from a profligate Habit of
Mind, being insensible of the [Satisfaction<footnote name="(1)" url="../november_footnotes/footnote236.xml"></footnote>] in that Way of
Life, and treating their Wives with the most barbarous Disrespect.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Particular Circumstances and Cast of Temper, must teach a Man the
Probability of mighty Uneasinesses in that State, (for
unquestionably some there are whose very Dispositions are strangely
averse to conjugal Friendship;) but no one, I believe, is by his own
natural Complexion prompted to teaze and torment another for no
Reason but being nearly allied to him: And can there be any thing
more base, or serve to sink a Man so much below his own
distinguishing Characteristick, (I mean Reason) than returning Evil
for Good in so open a Manner, as that of treating an helpless
Creature with Unkindness, who has had so good an Opinion of him as
to believe what he said relating to one of the greatest Concerns of
Life, by delivering her Happiness in this World to his Care and
Protection? Must not that Man be abandoned even to all manner of
Humanity, who can deceive a Woman with Appearances of Affection and
Kindness, for no other End but to torment her with more Ease and
Authority? Is any Thing more unlike a Gentleman, than when his
Honour is engaged for the performing his Promises, because nothing
but that can oblige him to it, to become afterwards false to his
Word, and be alone the Occasion of Misery to one whose Happiness he
but lately pretended was dearer to him than his own? Ought such a
one to be trusted in his common Affairs? or treated but as one
whose Honesty consisted only in his Incapacity of being otherwise?</paragraph>
<paragraph>There is one Cause of this Usage no less absurd than common, which
takes place among the more unthinking Men; and that is the Desire
to appear to their Friends free and at Liberty, and without those
Trammels they have so much ridiculed, [To avoid<footnote name="(2)" url="../november_footnotes/footnote236.xml"></footnote>] this they fly
into the other Extream, and grow Tyrants that they may seem
Masters. Because an uncontroulable Command of their own Actions is
a certain Sign of entire Dominion, they won't so much as recede
from the Government even in one Muscle of their Faces. A kind Look
they believe would be fawning, and a civil Answer yielding the
Superiority. To this must we attribute an Austerity they betray in
every Action: What but this can put a Man out of Humour in his
Wife's Company, tho' he is so distinguishingly pleasant every where
else? The Bitterness of his Replies, and the Severity of his Frowns
to the tenderest of Wives, clearly demonstrate, that an
ill-grounded Fear of being thought too submissive, is at the Bottom
of this, as I am willing to call it, affected Moroseness; but if it
be such only, put on to convince his Acquaintance of his entire
Dominion, let him take Care of the Consequence, which will be
certain, and worse than the present Evil; his seeming Indifference
will by Degrees grow into real Contempt, and if it doth not wholly
alienate the Affections of his Wife for ever from him, make both
him and her more miserable than if it really did so.</paragraph>
<paragraph>However inconsistent it may appear, to be thought a well-bred Person has no
small Share in this clownish Behaviour: A Discourse therefore
relating to good Breeding towards a loving and a tender Wife, would
be of great Use to this Sort of Gentlemen. Could you but once
convince them, that to be civil at least is not beneath the
Character of a Gentleman, nor even tender Affection towards one who
would make it reciprocal, betrays any Softness or Effeminacy that
the most masculine Disposition need be ashamed of; could you
satisfy them of the Generosity of voluntary Civility, and the
Greatness of Soul that is conspicuous in Benevolence without
immediate Obligations; could you recommend to People's Practice the
Saying of the Gentleman quoted in one of your Speculations, <italic>That he
thought it incumbent upon him to make the Inclinations of a Woman
of Merit go along with her Duty:</italic> Could you, I say, perswade these
Men of the Beauty and Reasonableness of this Sort of Behaviour, I
have so much Charity for some of them at least, to believe you
would convince them of a Thing they are only ashamed to allow:
Besides, you would recommend that State in its truest, and
consequently its most agreeable Colours; and the Gentlemen who have
for any Time been such professed Enemies to it, when Occasion
should serve, would return you their Thanks for assisting their
Interest in prevailing over their Prejudices. Marriage in general
would by this Means be a more easy and comfortable Condition; the
Husband would be no where so well satisfied as in his own Parlour,
nor the Wife so pleasant as in the Company of her Husband: A Desire
of being agreeable in the Lover would be increased in the Husband,
and the Mistress be more amiable by becoming the Wife. Besides all
which, I am apt to believe we should find the Race of Men grow
wiser as their Progenitors grew kinder, and the Affection of the
Parents would be conspicuous in the Wisdom of their Children; in
short, Men would in general be much better humoured than they are,
did not they so frequently exercise the worst Turns of their Temper
where they ought to exert the best.</paragraph>
<paragraph>MR. SPECTATOR,</paragraph>
<paragraph>I am a Woman who left the Admiration of this whole Town, to throw myself
([for<footnote name="(3)" url="../november_footnotes/footnote236.xml"></footnote>] Love of Wealth) into the Arms of a Fool. When I married him, I
could have had any one of several Men of Sense who languished for
me; but my Case is just. I believed my superior Understandmg would
form him into a tractable Creature. But, alas, my Spouse has
Cunning and Suspicion, the inseparable Companions of little Minds;
and every Attempt I make to divert, by putting on an agreeable Air,
a sudden Chearfulness, or kind Behaviour, he looks upon as the
first Act towards an Insurrection against his undeserved Dominion
over me. Let everyone who is still to chuse, and hopes to govern a
Fool, remember</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>TRISTISSA.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,   <italic>St. Martins, November</italic> 25.</paragraph>
<paragraph>This is to complain of an evil Practice which I think very well
deserves a Redress, though you have not as yet taken any Notice of
it: If you mention it in your Paper, it may perhaps have a very
good Effect. What I mean is the Disturbance some People give to
others at Church, by their Repetition of the Prayers after the
Minister, and that not only in the Prayers, but also the Absolution
and the Commandments fare no better, which are in a particular
Manner the Priest's Office: This I have known done in so audible a
manner, that sometimes their Voices have been as loud as his. As
little as you would think it, this is frequently done by People
seemingly devout. This irreligious Inadvertency is a Thing
extremely offensive: But I do riot recommend it as a Thing I give
you Liberty to ridicule, but hope it may be amended by the bare
Mention,</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>SIR, Your very humble Servant, T. S.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>T.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. [Satisfactions]</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. [For this Reason should they appeal the least like what they
were so much used to laugh at, they would become the Jest of
themselves, and the Object of that Raillery they formerly bestowed
on others. To avoid]</paragraph>
<paragraph>3. [by], and in first reprint.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
