<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<header>
<title>The Spectator</title>
  <number>no. 186</number>
  <date>1711-10-03</date>
  <author>Joseph Addison</author>
  <quotation>C&#230;lum ipsum petimus stultiti&#226;.--- Hor.<link name="(*)" url="http://meta.montclair.edu/latintexts/horace/odes/Iliber3.xml"></link></quotation>
  <translation>Hor. 3 Od. i. 38.</translation>
  <translation>High Heaven itself our impious rage assails. --P.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>UPON my Return to my Lodgings last Night I found a Letter from my worthy Friend the
Clergyman, whom I have given some Account of in my former Papers.
He tells me in it that he was particularly pleased with the latter
Part of my Yesterday's Speculation; and at the same time enclosed
the following Essay, which he desires me to publish as the Sequel
of that Discourse. It consists partly of uncommon Reflections, and
partly of such as have been already used, but now set in a stronger
Light.</paragraph>
<paragraph>A Believer may be excused by the most hardened Atheist for
endeavouring to make him a Convert, because he does it with an Eye
both their Interests. The Atheist is inexcusable who tries to gain
over a Believer, because he does not propose the doing himself or
the Believer any Good by such a Conversion.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The Prospect of a future State is the secret Comfort and Refreshment of my Soul; it
is that which makes Nature look gay about me; it doubles all my
Pleasures, and supports me under all my Afflictions. I can look at
Disappointments and Misfortunes, Pain and Sickness, Death itself,
and, what is worse than Death, the Loss of those who are dearest to
me, with Indifference, so long as I keep in view the Pleasures of
Eternity, and the State of Being in which there will be no Fears
nor Apprehensions, Pains nor Sorrows, Sickness nor Separation. Why
will any Man be so impertinently Officious as to tell me all this
is only Fancy and Delusion? Is there any Merit in being the
Messenger of ill News? If it is a Dream, let me enjoy it, since it
makes me both the happier and better Man.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I must confess I do not
know how to trust a Man [who<footnote name="(1)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote186.xml"></footnote>] believes neither Heaven nor Hell,
or, in other Words, a future State of Rewards and Punishments. Not
only natural Self-love, but Reason directs us to promote our own
Interest above all Things. It can never be for the Interest of a
Believer to do me a Mischief, because he is sure upon the Balance
of Accompts to find himself a Loser by it. On the contrary, if he
considers his own Welfare in his Behaviour towards me, it will lead
him to do me all the Good he can, and at the same Time restrain him
from doing me any Injury. An Unbeliever does not act like a
reasonable Creature, if he favours me contrary to his present
Interest, or does not distress me when it turns to his present
Advantage. Honour and Good-nature may indeed tie up his Hands; but
as these would be very much strengthened by Reason and Principle,
so without them they are only Instincts, or wavering unsettled
Notions, [which<footnote name="(2)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote186.xml"></footnote>] rest on no Foundation.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Infidelity has been attack'd with so good Success of late Years, that it is driven out
of all its Out-works. The Atheist has not found his Post tenable,
and is therefore retired into Deism, and a Disbelief of revealed
Religion only. But the Truth of it is, the greatest Number of this
Set of Men, are those who, for. want of a virtuous Education, or
examining the Grounds of Religion, know so very little of the
Matter in Question, that their Infidelity is but another Term for
their Ignorance.</paragraph>
<paragraph>As Folly and Inconsiderateness are the Foundations
of Infidelity, the great Pillars and Supports of it are either a
Vanity of appearing wiser than the rest of Mankind, or an
Ostentation of Courage in despising the Terrors of another World,
which have so great an Influence on what they call weaker Minds; or
an Aversion to a Relief that must cut them off from many of those
Pleasures they propose to themselves, and fill them with Remorse
for many of those they have already tasted.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The great received Articles of the Christian Religion have been so clearly proved,
from the Authority of that Divine Revelation in which they are
delivered, that it is impossible for those who have Ears to hear,
and Eyes to see, not to be convinced of them. But were it possible
for any thing in the Christian, Faith to be erroneous, I can find
no ill Consequences in adhering to it. The great Points of the
Incarnation and Sufferings of our Saviour produce naturally such
Habits of Virtue in the Mind of Man, that I say, supposing it were
Possible for us to be mistaken in them, the Infidel himself must at
least allow that no other System of Religion could so effectually
contribute to the heightning of Morality. They give us great Ideas
of the Dignity of human Nature, and of the Love which the Supreme
Being bears to his Creatures, and consequently engage us in the
highest Acts of Duty towards our Creator, Our Neighbour, and our
selves. How many noble Arguments has Saint <italic>Paul</italic> raised from the
chief Articles of our Religion, for the advancing of Morality in
its three great Branches? To give a single Example in each Kind:
What can be a stronger Motive to a firm Trust and Reliance on the
Mercies of our Maker, than the giving us his Son to suffer for us?
What can make us love and esteem even the most inconsiderable of
Mankind more than the Thought that Christ died for him? Or what
dispose us to set a stricter Guard upon the Purity of Our own
Hearts, than our being Members of Christ, and a Part of the Society
of which that immaculate Person is the Head? But these are only a
Specimen of those admirable Enforcements of Morality, which the
Apostle has drawn from the History of our blessed Saviour.</paragraph>
<paragraph>If our modern Infidels considered these Matters with that Candour and
Seriousness which they deserve, we should not see them act with
such a Spirit of Bitterness, Arrogance, and Malice: They would not
be raising such insignificant Cavils, Doubts, and Scruples, as may
be started against every thing that is not capable of mathematical
Demonstration; in order to unsettle the Minds of the Ignorant,
disturb the publick Peace, subvert Morality, and throw all things
into Confusion and Disorder. If none of these Reflections can have
any Influence on them, there is one that perhaps may, because it is
adapted to their Vanity, by which they seem to be guided much more
than their Reason. I would therefore have them consider, that the
wisest and best of Men, in all Ages of the World, have been those
who lived up to the Religion of their Country, when they saw
nothing in it opposite to Morality, and [to] the best Lights they
had of the Divine Nature. <italic>Pythagoras's</italic> first Rule directs us to
worship the Gods <italic>as it is ordained by Law,</italic> for that is the most
natural Interpretation of the Precept.<footnote name="(3)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote186.xml"></footnote> Socrates, who was the
most renowned among the Heathens both for Wisdom and Virtue, in his
last Moments desires his Friends to offer a Cock to to <italic>&#198;sculapius;</italic><footnote name="(4)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote186.xml"></footnote> out of a submissive Deference to the established Worship of his
Country. <italic>Xenophon</italic> tells us that his Prince (whom he sets forth as a
Pattern of Perfection), when he found his Death approaching,
offered Sacrifices on the Mountains to the <italic>Persian Jupiter,</italic> and the
Sun, <italic>according to the Custom of the Persians;</italic> for those are the
Words of the Historians.<footnote name="(5)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote186.xml"></footnote> Nay, the <italic>Epicureans</italic> and Atomical
Philosophers shewed a very remarkable Modesty in this Particular;
for though the Being of a God was entirely repugnant to their
Schemes of natural Philosophy, they contented themselves with the
Denial of a Providence, asserting at the same Time the Existence of
Gods in general; because they would not shock the common Belief of
Mankind, and the Religion of their Country.</paragraph>
<paragraph>L.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. [that]</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. [that]</paragraph>
<paragraph>3. Which is motto to No.112.</paragraph>
<paragraph>4. Phaedon.</paragraph>
<paragraph>5. Cyropaedia, Bk. viii.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
