<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<header>
<title>The Spectator</title>
  <number>no. 191</number>
  <date>1711-10-09</date>
  <author>Joseph Addison</author>
  <quotation>----------&#959;&#965;&#955;&#959;&#957; &#965;&#957;&#949;&#953;&#961;&#959;&#957;.</quotation>
  <translation>------Deluding visions of the night. --Pope.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>SOME ludricous Schoolmen have put the Case, that if an
Ass were placed between two Bundles of Hay, which affected his
Senses equally on each Side, and tempted him in the very same
Degree, whether it would be possible for him to Eat of either. They
generally determine this Question to the Disadvantage of the Ass,
who they say would starve in the Midst of Plenty, as not having a
single Grain of Freewill to determine him more to the one than to
the other. The Bundle of Hay on either Side striking his Sight and
Smell in the same Proportion, would keep him in a perpetual
Suspence, like the two Magnets which, Travellers have told us, are
placed one of them in the Roof, and the other in the Floor of
<italic>Mahomet's</italic> Burying-place at <italic>Mecca,</italic> and by that means, say they, pull
the Impostor's Iron Coffin with such an equal Attraction, that it
hangs in the Air between both of them. As for the Ass's Behaviour
in such nice Circumstances, whether he would Starve sooner than
violate his Neutrality to the two Bundles of Hay, I shall not
presume to determine; but only take Notice of the Conduct of our
own Species in the same Perplexity. When a Man has a mind to
venture his Money in a Lottery, every Figure of it appears equally
alluring, and as likely to succeed as any of its Fellows. They all
of them have the same Pretensions to good Luck, stand upon the same
foot of Competition, and no manner of Reason can be given why a Man
should prefer one to the other before the Lottery is drawn. In this
Case therefore Caprice very often acts the Place of Reason, and
forms to it self some Groundless Imaginary Motive, where real and
substantial ones are wanting. I know a well-meaning Man that is
very well pleased to risk his good Fortune upon the Number 1711,
because it is the Year of our Lord. I am acquainted with a Tacker
that would give a good deal for the Number 134.<footnote name="(1)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote191.xml"></footnote> On the contrary
I have been told of a certain Zealous Dissenter, who being a great
Enemy to Popery, and believing that bad Men are the most fortunate
in this World, will lay two to one on the Number [666<footnote name="(2)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote191.xml"></footnote>] against
any other Number, because, says he, it is the Number of the Beast.
Several would prefer the Number 12000 before any other, as it is
the Number of the Pounds in the great Prize. In short, some are
pleased to find their own Age in their Number; some that they have
got a number which makes a pretty Appearance in the Cyphers, and
others, because it is the same Number that succeeded in the last
Lottery. Each of these, upon no other Grounds, thinks he stands
fairest for the great Lot, and that he is possessed of what may not
be improperly called the <italic>Golden Number.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>These Principles of Election are the Pastimes and Extravagancies of Human Reason, which
is of so busie a Nature, that it will be exerting it self in the
meanest Trifles and working even when it wants Materials. The
wisest of Men are sometimes acted by such unaccountable Motives, as
the Life of the Fool and the Superstitious is guided by nothing
else.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I am surprized that none of the Fortune-tellers, or, as the
<italic>French</italic> call them, the <italic>Diseurs de bonne Avanture,</italic> who Publish their
Bills in every Quarter of the Town, have not turned our Lotteries
to their Advantage; did any of them set up for a Caster of
fortunate Figures, what might he not get by his pretended
Discoveries and Predictions?</paragraph>
<paragraph>I remember among the Advertisements in
the <italic>Post-Boy</italic> of <italic>September</italic> the 27th, I was surprized to see the
following one:</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>This is to give notice, That Ten shillings over and
above the Market-Price, will be given for the Ticket in the
&#163;1500000 Lottery,</italic> No.132, <italic>by Nath. Cliff at the Bible and
Three Crowns in Cheapside.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>This Advertisement has given great
Matter of Speculation to Coffee-house Theorists. Mr. <italic>Cliff's</italic>
Principles and Conversation have been canvassed upon this Occasion,
and various Conjectures made why he should thus set his Heart upon
Number 132. I have examined all the Powers in those Numbers, broken
them into Fractions, extracted the Square and Cube Root, divided
and multiplied them all Ways, but could not arrive at the Secret
till about three Days ago, when I received the following Letter
from an unknown Hand, by which I find that Mr. <italic>Nathaniel Cliff</italic> is
only the Agent, and not the Principal, in this Advertisement.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Mr.</italic> SPECTATOR,</paragraph>
<paragraph>I am the Person that lately advertised I would give ten
Shillings more than the current Price for the Ticket No. 132 in the
Lottery now drawing; which is a Secret I have communicated to some
Friends, who rally me incessantly upon that Account. You must know
I have but one Ticket, for which Reason, and a certain Dream I have
lately had more than , I was resolved it should be the Number I
most approved. I am so positive I have pitched upon the great Lot,
that I could almost lay all I am worth of it. My Visions are so
frequent and strong upon this Occasion, that I have not only
possessed the Lot, but disposed of the Money which in all
probability it will sell for. This Morning, in particular, I set up
an Equipage which I look upon to be the gayest in the Town. The
Liveries are very Rich, but not Gaudy. I should be very glad to see
a Speculation or two upon Lottery Subjects, in which you would
oblige all People concerned, and in particular</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Your most humble Servant,</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>George Gossling.</paragraph>
<paragraph>P. S. Dear SPEC, if I get the 12000 Pound, I'll make thee a handsome Present.</paragraph>
<paragraph>After having wished my
Correspondent good Luck, and thanked him for his intended Kindness,
I shall for this time dismiss the Subject or the Lottery, and only
observe that the greatest Part of Mankind are in some degree guilty
of my Friend <italic>Gossling's</italic> extravagance. We are apt to rely upon
future Prospects, and become really expensive while we are only
rich in Possibility. We live up to Our Expectations, not to our
Possessions, and make a Figure proportionable to what we may be,
not what we are. We out-run our present Income, as not doubting to
disburse our selves out of the Profits of some future Place,
Project, or Reversion, that we have in view. It Is through this
Temper of Mind, which is so common among us, that we see Tradesmen
break, who have met with no Misfortunes in their Business; and Men
of Estates reduced to Poverty, who have never suffered from Losses
or Repairs, Tenants, Taxes, or Law-suits. In short, it is this
foolish sanguine Temper, this depending upon Contingent Futurities,
that occasions Romantick Generosity, Chymerical Grandeur, Senseless
Ostentation, and generally ends in Beggary and Ruin. The Man, who
will live above his present Circumstances, is in great Danger of
living in a little time much beneath them, or, as the <italic>Italian</italic>
Proverb runs, The Man who lives by Hope will die by Hunger.</paragraph>
<paragraph>It should be an indispensable Rule in Life, to contract our Desires to
our present Condition, and whatever may be our Expectations, to
live within the compass of what we actually possess. It will be
Time enough to enjoy an Estate when it comes into our Hands; but if
we anticipate our good Fortune, we shall lose the Pleasure of it
when it arrives, and may possibly never possess what we have so
foolishly counted upon.</paragraph>
<paragraph>L.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. The number of the minority who were
in 1704 for Tacking a Bill against Occasional Conformity to a Money
Bill.</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. [1666], and in first reprint.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
