<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<header>
<title>The Spectator</title>
  <number>no. 197</number>
  <date>1711-10-16</date>
  <author>Eustace Budgell</author>
  <quotation>Alter rixatur de lan&#226; saepe caprin&#226;,</quotation>
  <quotation>Propugnat nugis armatus: scilicet, ut non</quotation>
  <quotation>Sit mihi prima fides; et vere quod placet, ut non</quotation>
  <quotation>Acriter elatrem, pretium &#230;tas altera sordet.</quotation>
  <quotation>Ambigitur quid enim? Castor sciat an Docilis plus,</quotation>
  <quotation>Brundusium Numici melius via ducat an App&#238;.--- Hor.<link name="(*)" url="http://tabula.rutgers.edu:8080/cocoon/latintexts/horace/epistulae/1epistula18.xml"></link></quotation>
  <translation>Hor. I Ep. xviii. 15.</translation>
  <translation>On trifles some are earnestly absurd;</translation>
  <translation>You'll think the world depends on every word.</translation>
  <translation>What! is not every mortal free to speak?</translation>
  <translation>I'll give my reasons, though I break my neck!</translation>
  <translation>And what's the question? If it shines or rains:</translation>
  <translation>Whether 'tis twelve or fifteen miles to Staines. --Pitt.</translation>
</header>
<text>
<paragraph>EVERY Age a Man passes through, and Way of Life he engages in, has
some particular Vice or Imperfection naturally cleaving to it,
which it will require his nicest Care to avoid. The several
Weaknesses, to which Youth, Old Age, and Manhood are exposed, have
long since been set down by many both of the Poets and
Philosophers; but I do not remember to have met with any Author who
has treated of those ill Habits Men are subject to, not so much by
reason of their different Ages and Tempers, as the particular
Profession or Business in which they were educated and brought up.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I am the more surprised to find this Subject so little touched on,
since what I am here speaking of is so apparent as not to escape
the most vulgar Observation. The Business Men are chiefly
conversant in, does not only give a certain Cast or Turn to their
Minds, but is very often apparent in their outward Behaviour, and
some of the most indifferent Actions of their Lives. It is this Air
diffusing itself over the whole Man, which helps us to find out a
Person at his first Appearance; so that the most careless Observer
fancies he can scarce be mistaken in the Carriage of a Seaman or
the Gaite of a Taylor.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The liberal Arts, though they may possibly
have less Effect on our external Mein and Behaviour, make so deep
an Impression on the Mind, as is very apt to bend it wholly one
Way.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The Mathematician will take little less than Demonstration in
the most common Discourse, and the Schoolman is as great a Friend
to Definitions and Syllogisms. The Physician and Divine are often
heard to dictate in private Companies with the same Authority which
they exercise over their Patients and Disciples; while the Lawyer
is putting Cases and raising Matter for Disputation out of every
thing that occurs.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I may possibly some time or other animadvert
more at large on the particular Fault each Profession is most
infected with; but shall at present wholly apply my self to the
Cure of what I last mentioned, namely, That Spirit of Strife and
Contention in the Conversations of Gentlemen of the Long Robe.</paragraph>
<paragraph>This is the more ordinary, because these Gentlemen regarding Argument as
their own proper Province, and very often making ready Money of it,
think it unsafe to yield before Company. They are shewing in common
Talk how zealously they could defend a Cause in Court, and
therefore frequently forget to keep that Temper which is absolutely
requisite to render Conversation pleasant and instructive.</paragraph>
<paragraph>CAPTAIN SENTRY pushes this Matter so far, that I have heard him say, <italic>He has
known but few Pleaders that were tolerable Company.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>The Captain, who is a Man of good Sense, but dry Conversation, was last Night
giving me an Account of a Discourse, in which he had lately been
engaged with a young Wrangler in the Law. I was giving my Opinion,
says the Captain, without apprehending any Debate that might arise
from it, of a General's Behaviour in a Battle that was fought some
Years before either the Templer or my self were born. The young
Lawyer immediately took me up, and by reasoning above a Quarter of
an Hour upon a Subject which I saw he understood nothing of,
endeavoured to shew me that my Opinions were ill grounded. Upon
which, says the Captain, to avoid any farther Contests, I told him,
That truly I had not consider'd those several Arguments which he
had brought against me; and that there might be a great deal in
them. Ay, but says my Antagonist, who would not let me escape so,
there are several Things to be urged in favour of your Opinion
which you have omitted, and thereupon begun to shine on the other
Side of the Question. Upon this, says the Captain, I came over to
my first Sentiments, and entirely acquiesced in his Reasons for my
so doing. Upon which the Templer again recovered his former
Posture, and confuted both himself and me a third Time. In short,
says my Friend, I found he was resolved to keep me at Sword's
Length, and never let me close with him, so that I had nothing left
but to hold my tongue, and give my Antagonist free leave to smile
at his Victory, who I found, like <italic>Hudibras, could still change
Sides, and still confute.</italic><footnote name="(1)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote197.xml"></footnote></paragraph>
<paragraph>For my own part, I have ever regarded
our Inns of Courts as Nurseries of Statesmen and Law-givers, which
makes me often frequent that Part of the Town with great Pleasure.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Upon my calling in lately at one of the most noted <italic>Temple</italic>
Coffee-houses, I found the whole Room, which was full of young
Students, divided into several Parties, each of which was deeply
engaged in some Controversie. The Management of the late Ministry
was attacked and defended with great Vigour; and several
Preliminaries to the Peace were proposed by some, and rejected by
others; the demolishing of <italic>Dunkirk</italic> was so eagerly insisted on, and
so warmly controverted, as had like to have produced a Challenge.
In short, I observed that the Desire of Victory, whetted with the
little Prejudices of Party and Interest, generally carried the
Argument to such an Height, as made the Disputants insensibly
conceive an Aversion towards each other, and part with the highest
Dissatisfaction on both Sides.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The managing an Argument handsomely
being so nice a Point, and what I have seen so very few excel in, I
shall here set down a few Rules on that Head, which, among other
things, I gave in writing to a young Kinsman of mine who had made
so great a Proficiency in the Law, that he began to plead in
Company upon every Subject that was started.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Having the entire Manuscript by me, I may, perhaps, from time to time, publish such
Parts of it as I shall think requisite for the Instruction of the
<italic>British</italic> Youth. What regards my present Purpose is as follows:</paragraph>
<paragraph>Avoid Disputes as much as possible. In order to appear easie and
well-bred in Conversation, you may assure your self that it
requires more Wit, as well as more good Humour, to improve than to
contradict the Notions of another: But if you are at any time
Obliged to enter on an Argument, give your Reasons with the utmost
Coolness and Modesty, two Things which scarce ever fail of making
an Impression on the Hearers. Besides, if you are neither
Dogmatical, nor shew either by your Actions or Words, that you are
full of your self all will the more heartily rejoice at your
Victory. Nay, should you be pinched in your Argument, you may make
your Retreat with a very good Grace: You were never positive, and
are now glad to be better informed. This has made some approve the
Socratical Way of Reasoning, where while you scarce affirm any
thing, you can hardly be caught in an Absurdity; and tho' possibly
you are endeavouring to bring over another to your Opinion, which
is firmly fix'd, you seem only to desire Information from him.</paragraph>
<paragraph>In order to keep that Temper, which [is<footnote name="(2)" url="../october_footnotes/footnote197.xml"></footnote>] so difficult, and yet so
necessary to preserve, you may please to consider, that nothing can
be more unjust or ridiculous, that to be angry with another because
he is not of your Opinion. The Interests, Education, and Means by
which Men attain their Knowledge, are so very different, that it is
impossible they should all think alike; and he has at least as much
Reason to be angry with you, as you with him. Sometimes to keep
your self cool, it may be of Service to ask your self fairly, What
might have been your Opinion, had you all the Biasses of Education
and Interest your Adversary may possibly have? but if you contend
for the Honour of Victory alone, you may lay down this as an
Infallible Maxim. That you cannot make a more false Step, or give
your Antagonists a greater Advantage over you, than by falling into
a Passion.</paragraph>
<paragraph>When an Argument is over, how many weighty Reasons does
a Man recollect, which his Heat and Violence made him utterly
forget?</paragraph>
<paragraph>It is yet more absurd to be angry with a Man because he
does not apprehend the Force of your Reasons, or gives weak ones of
his own. If you argue for Reputation, this makes your Victory the
easier; he is certainly in all respects an Object of your Pity,
rather than Anger; and if he cannot comprehend what you do, you
ought to thank Nature for her Favours, who has given you so much
the clearer Understanding.</paragraph>
<paragraph>You may please to add this Consideration, That among your Equals no one values your Anger, which only preys upon its Master; and perhaps you may find it not
very consistent either with Prudence or your Ease, to punish your
self whenever you meet with a Fool or a Knave.</paragraph>
<paragraph>Lastly, If you propose to your self the true End of Argument, which is
Information, it may be a seasonable Check to your Passion; for if
you search purely after Truth, 'twill be almost indifferent to you
where you find it. I cannot in this Place omit an Observation which
I have often made, namely, That nothing procures a Man more Esteem
and less Envy from the whole Company, than if he chooses the Part
of Moderator, without engaging directly on either Side in a
Dispute. This gives him the Character of Impartial, furnishes him
with an Opportunity of sifting Things to the Bottom, shewing his
Judgment, and of sometimes making handsome Compliments to each of
the contending Parties.</paragraph>
<paragraph>I shall close this Subject with giving you
one Caution: When you have gained a Victory, do not push it too
far; 'tis sufficient to let the Company and your Adversary see 'tis
in your Power, but that you are too generous to make use of it.</paragraph>
<paragraph>X.</paragraph>


<paragraph>1. Part I., canto i. , v. 69, 70.</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. [it is], and in first reprint.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
