<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<title>The Spectator 270</title>
<header>
  <number>no. 270</number>
  <date>1712-01-09</date>
  <author>Richard Steele</author>
  <quotation>Discit enim citius, meminitque libentius illud,</quotation>
  <quotation>Quod quis deridet, quam quod probat----- Hor.<link name="(*)" url="http://meta.montclair.edu/latintexts/horace/epistulae/2epistula1.xml"></link></quotation>
  <translation>Hor. II Ep. i. 262-3.</translation>
  <translation>For what's derided by the censuring crowd,</translation>
  <translation>Is thought on more than what is just and good. --- Creech.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>I DO not know that I have been in greater Delight
for these many Years, than in beholding the Boxes at the Play the
last Time <italic>The Scornful Lady</italic><footnote name="(1)" url="../january_footnotes/footnote270.xml"></footnote>
was acted. So great an Assembly of
Ladies placed in gradual Rows in all the Ornaments of Jewels, Silk
and Colours, gave so lively arid gay an Impression to the Heart,
that methought the Season of the Year was vanished; and I did not
think it an ill Expression of a young Fellow who stood near me,
that called the Boxes Those Beds of Tulips. It was pretty Variation
of the Prospect, when any one of these fine Ladles rose up and did
Honour to herself and Friend at a Distance, by curtisying; and gave
Opportunity to that Friend to shew her Charms to the same Advantage
in returning the Salutation. Here that Action is as proper and
graceful, as it is at Church unbecoming and impertinent. By the
way, I must take the Liberty to observe that I did not see anyone
who is usually so full of Civilities at Church, offer at any such
Indecorum during any Part of the Action of the Play. Such beautiful
Prospects gladden our Minds, and when considered in general, give
innocent and pleasing Ideas. He that dwells upon anyone Object of
Beauty, may fix his Imagination to his Disquiet; but the
Contemplation of a whole Assembly together, is a Defence against
the Encroachment of Desire: At least to me, who have taken pains to
look at Beauty abstracted from the Consideration of its being the
Object of Desire; at power, only as it sits upon another, without
any Hopes of partaking any Share of it; at Wisdom and Capacity,
without any Pretensions to rival or envy its Acquisitions: I say to
me, who am really free from forming any Hopes by beholding the
Persons of beautiful Women, or warming my self into Ambition from
the Successes of other Men, this World is not only a meer Scene,
but a very pleasant one. Did Mankind but know the Freedom which
there is in keeping thus aloof from the World, I should have more
Imitators, than the powerfullest Man in the Nation has Followers.
To be no Man's Rival in Love, or Competitor in Business, is a
Character which if it does not recommend you as it ought to
Benevolence among those whom you live with, yet has it certainly
this Effect, that you do not stand so much in need of their
Approbation, as you would if you aimed at it more, in setting your
Heart on the same things which the Generality doat on. By this
means, and with this easy Philosophy, I am never less at a Play
than when I am at the Theatre; but indeed I am seldom so well
pleased with the Action as in that Place, for most Men follow
Nature no longer than while they are in their Night-Gowns, and all
the busy Part of the Day are in Characters which they neither
become or act in with Pleasure to themselves or their Beholders.
But to return to my Ladies: I was very well pleased, to see so
great a Crowd of them assembled at a Play, wherein the Heroine, as
the Phrase is, is so just a Picture of the Vanity of the Sex in
tormenting their Admirers. The Lady who pines for the Man whom she
treats with so much Impertinence and Inconstancy, is drawn with
much Art and Humour. Her Resolutions to be extremely civil, but her
Vanity arising just at the Instant that she resolved to express her
self kindly, are described as by one who had studied the Sex. But
when my Admiration is fixed upon this excellent Character, and two
or three others in the Play, I must confess I was moved with the
utmost Indignation at the trivial, senseless, and unnatural
Representation of the Chaplain. It is possible there may be a
Pedant in Holy Orders, and we have seen one or two of them in the
World ; but such a Driveler as Sir <italic>Roger,</italic> so bereft of all manner
of Pride, which is the Characteristick of a Pedant, is what one
would not believe could come into the Head of the same Man who drew
the rest of the Play. The Meeting between <italic>Welford</italic> and him shews a
Wretch without any Notion of the Dignity of his Function; and it is
out of all common sense that he should give all Account of himself
<italic>as one sent four or five Miles in a Morning on Foot for Eggs.</italic> It is
not to be denied, but his Part and that of the Maid whom he makes
Love to, are excellently well performed; but a Thing which is
blameable in itself, grows still more so by the Success in the
Execution of it. It is so mean a Thing to gratify a loose Age with
a scandalous Representation of what is reputable among Men, not to
say what is sacred, that no Beauty, no Excellence in an Author
ought to at tone for it; nay, such Excellence is an Aggravation of
his Guilt, and an Argument that he errs against the Conviction of
his own Understanding and Conscience. Wit should be tried by this
Rule, and an Audience should rise against such a Scene, as throws
down the Reputation of any thing which the Consideration of
Religion or Decency should preserve from Contempt. But all this
Evil arises from this one Corruption of Mind, that makes Men resent
Offences against their Virtue, less than those against their
Understanding. An Author shall write as if he thought there was not
one Man of Honour or Woman of Chastity in the House, and come off
with Applause: For an Insult upon all the Ten Commandments, with
the little Criticks, is not so bad as the Breach of an Unity of
Time or Place. Half Wits do not apprehend the Miseries that must
necessarily flow from Degeneracy of Manners; nor do they know that
Order is the Support of Society. Sir <italic>Roger</italic> and his Mistress are
Monsters of the Poets own forming; the Sentiments in both of them
are such as do not arise in Fools of their Education. We all know
that a silly Scholar, instead of being below every one he meets
with, is apt to be exalted above the Rank of such as are really his
Superiors: His Arrogance is always founded upon particular Notions
of Distinction in his own Head, accompanied with a pedantick Scorn
of all Fortune and Preheminence, when compared with his Knowledge
and Learning. This very one Character of Sir <italic>Roger,</italic> as silly as it
really is, has done more towards the Disparagement of Holy Orders,
and consequently of Virtue it self, than all the Wit that Author or
any other could make up for in the Conduct of the longest Life
after it. I do not pretend, in saying this, to give myself Airs of
more Virtue than my Neighbours, but assert it from the Principles
by which Mankind must always be governed. Sallies of Imagination
are to be overlook'd, when they are committed out of Warmth in the
Recommendation of what is Praise worthy; but a deliberate advancing
of Vice, with all the Wit in the World, is as ill an Action as any
that comes before the Magistrate, and ought to be received as such
by the People.</paragraph>
<paragraph>T.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. Beaumont and Fletcher's.</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
