<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!DOCTYPE issue SYSTEM "spectator.dtd">
<?xml-stylesheet href="spectator.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<?cocoon-process type="xslt"?>
<issue>
<header>
<title>The Spectator</title>
  <number>no. 183</number>
  <date>1711-09-29</date>
  <author>Joseph Addison</author>
  <quotation>&#921;&#959;&#956;&#949;&#957; &#968;&#949;&#965;&#948;&#949;&#945; &#960;&#959;&#955;&#955;&#945; &#955;&#949;&#947;&#949;&#953;&#957; &#949;&#964;&#965;&#956;&#959;&#953;&#963;&#953;&#957; &#959;&#956;&#959;&#953;&#945;,</quotation>
  <quotation>&#921;&#948;&#956;&#949;&#957; &#959; &#949;&#965;&#964; &#949;&#952;&#949;&#955;&#969;&#956;&#949;&#957; &#945;&#955;&#951;&#952;&#953;&#945; &#956;&#965;&#952;&#951;&#963;&#945;&#963;&#952;&#945;&#953;.----Hesiod.</quotation>
  <translation>Hesiod, Theogony. 27-28.</translation>
  <translation>Sometimes fair truth in fiction we disguise;</translation>
  <translation>Sometimes present her naked to men's eyes. --P.</translation>
  </header>
<text>
<paragraph>FABLES were the first Pieces of Wit
that made their Appearance in the World, and have been still highly
valued, not only in Times of the greatest Simplicity, but among the
most polite Ages of Mankind. <italic>Jotham's</italic> Fable of the Trees<footnote name="(1)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote> is the
oldest that is extant, and as beautiful as any which have been made
since that Time. <italic>Nathan's</italic> Fable of the poor Man and his Lamb<footnote name="(2)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote> is
likewise more ancient than any that is extant, besides the
above-mentioned, and had so good an Effect, as to convey
Instruction to the Ear of a King without offending it, and to bring
the Man after God's own Heart to a right Sense of his Guilt and his
Duty. We find <italic>&#198;sop</italic> in the most distant Ages of <italic>Greece;</italic> and if we
look into the very Beginnings of the Commonwealth of <italic>Rome,</italic> we see a
Mutiny among the Common People appeased by a Fable of the Belly and
the Limbs,<footnote name="(3)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote> which was indeed very proper to gain the Attention
of an incensed Rabble, at a Time when perhaps they would have torn
to Pieces any Man who had preached the same Doctrine to them in an
open and direct Manner, As Fables took their Birth in the very
Infancy of Learning, they never flourished more than when Learning
was at its greatest Height. To justify this Assertion, I shall put
my Reader in mind of <italic>Horace,</italic> the greatest Wit and Critick in the
<italic>Augustan</italic> Age; and of <italic>Boileau,</italic> the most correct Poet among the
Moderns: Not to mention La <italic>Fontaine,</italic> who by this Way of Writing is
come more into Vogue than any other Author of our Times.</paragraph>
<paragraph>The Fables I have here mentioned are raised altogether upon Brutes and
Vegetables, with some of our own Species mixt among them, when the
Moral hath so required. But besides this kind of Fable, there is
another in which the Actors are Passions, Virtues, Vices, and other
imaginary Persons of the like Nature. Some of the ancient Criticks
will have it, that the Iliad and Odyssey of <italic>Homer</italic> are Fables of
this Nature: and that the several Names of Gods and Heroes are
nothing else but the Affections of the Mind in a visible Shape and
Character. Thus they tell us, that <italic>Achilles,</italic> in the first Iliad,
represents Anger, or the Irascible Part of Human Nature; That upon
drawing his Sword against his Superior in a full Assembly, <italic>Pallas</italic>
is only another Name for Reason, which checks and advises him upon
that Occasion; and at her first Appearance touches him upon the
Head, that Part of the Man being looked upon as the Seat of Reason.
And thus of the rest of the Poem. As for the Odyssey, I think it is
plain that <italic>Horace</italic> considered it as one of these Allegorical Fables,
by the Moral which he has given us of several Parts of it. The
greatest <italic>Italian</italic> Wits have applied themselves to the Writing of
this latter kind of Fables: As <italic>Spencer's Fairy-Queen</italic> is one
continued Series of them from the Beginning to the End of that
admirable Work. If we look into the finest Prose Authors of
Antiquity, such as <italic>Cicero, Plato, Xenophon,</italic> and many others, we
shall find that this was likewise their Favourite Kind of Fable. I
shall only further observe upon it, that the first of this Sort
that made any considerable Figure in the World, was that of
<italic>Hercules</italic> meeting with Pleasure and Virtue; which was invented by
<italic>Prodicus,</italic> who lived before <italic>Socrates,</italic> and in the first Dawnings of
Philosophy. He used to travel through Greece by vertue of this
Fable, which procured him a kind Reception in all the Market-towns,
where he never failed telling it as soon as he had gathered an
Audience about him.<footnote name="(4)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote></paragraph>
<paragraph>After this short Preface, which I have made
up of such Materials as my Memory does at present suggest to me,
before I present my Reader with a Fable of this Kind, which I
design as the Entertainment of the present Paper, I must in a few
Words open the Occasion of it.</paragraph>
<paragraph>In the Account which <italic>Plato</italic> gives us
of the Conversation and Behaviour of <italic>Socrates,</italic> the Morning he was
to die, he tells the following Circumstance.</paragraph>
<paragraph>When <italic>Socrates</italic> his Fetters were knocked off (as was usual to be done on the Day that
the condemned Person was to be executed) being seated in the midst
of his Disciples, and laying one of his Legs over the other, in a
very unconcerned Posture, he began to rub it where it had been
galled by the Iron; and whether it was to shew the Indifference
with which he entertained the Thoughts of his approaching Death, or
(after his usual Manner) to take every Occasion of Philosophizing
upon some useful Subject, he observed the Pleasure of that
Sensation which now arose in those very Parts of his Leg, that just
before had been so much pained by the Fetter. Upon this he
reflected on the Nature of Pleasure and Pain in general, and how
constantly they succeeded one another. To this he added, That if a
Man of a good Genius for a Fable were to represent the Nature of
Pleasure and Pain in that Way of Writing, he would probably join
them together after such a manner, that it would be impossible for
the one to come into any Place without being followed by the other.<footnote name="(5)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote></paragraph>
<paragraph>It is possible, that if <italic>Plato</italic> had thought it proper at such a
Time to describe <italic>Socrates</italic> launching out into a Discourse [which<footnote name="(6)" url="../september_footnotes/footnote183.xml"></footnote>] was not of a piece with the Business of the Day, he would have
enlarged upon this Hint, and have drawn it out into some beautiful
Allegory or Fable. But since he has not done it, I shall attempt to
write one myself in the Spirit of that Divine Author.</paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>There were two Families which from the Beginning of the World were as opposed
to each other as Light and Darkness. The one of them lived in
Heaven, and the other in Hell. The youngest Descendant of the first
Family was Pleasure, who was the Daughter of Happiness, who was the
Child of Virtue, who was the Offspring of the Gods. These, as I
said before, had their Habitation in Heaven. The youngest of the
opposite Family was Pain, who was the Son of Misery, who was the
Child of Vice, who was the Offspring of the Furies. The Habitation
of this Race of Beings was in Hell.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>The middle Station of Nature
between these two opposite Extremes was the Earth, which was
inhabited by Creatures of a middle Kind, neither so Virtuous as the
one, nor so Vicious as the other, but partaking of the good and bad
Qualities of these two opposite Families.</italic> Jupiter <italic>considering that
this Species commonly called Man, was too virtuous to be miserable,
and too Vicious to be happy; that he might make a Distinction
between the Good and the Bad, ordered the two youngest of the
above-mentioned Families, Pleasure who was the Daughter of
Happiness, and Pain who was the Son of Misery, to meet one another
upon this Part of Nature which lay in the half-Way between them,
having promised to settle it upon them both, provided they could
agree upon the Division of it, so as to share Mankind between them.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>Pleasure and Pain were no sooner met in their new Habitation, but
they immediately agreed upon this Point, that Pleasure should take
Possession of the Virtuous, and Pain of the Vicious Part of that
Species which was given up to them. But upon examining to which of
them any Individual they met with belonged, they found each of them
had a Right to him; for that, contrary to what they had seen in
their old Places of Residence, there was no Person so Vicious who
had not some Good in him, nor any Person so Virtuous who had not in
him some Evil. The Truth of it is, they generally found upon
Search, that in the most vicious Man Pleasure might lay a Claim to
an hundredth Part, and that in the most virtuous Man Pain might
come in for at least two Thirds. This they saw would occasion
endless Disputes between them, unless they could come to some
Accommodation. To this end there was a Marriage proposed between
them, and at length concluded; By this means it is that we find
Pleasure and Pain are such constant Yoke-fellows, and that they
either make their Visits together, or are never far asunder. If
Pain comes into an Heart, he is quickly followed by Pleasure; and
if Pleasure enters, you may be sure Pain is not far off.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph><italic>But notwithstanding this Marriage was very convenient for the two
Parties, it did not seem to answer the Intention of</italic> Jupiter<italic> in
sending them among Mankind. To remedy therefore this Inconvenience,
it was stipulated between them by Article, and confirmed by the
Consent of each Family, that notwithstanding they here possessed
that Species indifferently; upon the Death of every single Person,
if he was found to have in him a certain Proportion of Evil, he
should be dispatched into the infernal Regions by a Passport from
Pain, there to dwell with Misery, Vice and the Furies. Or on the
contrary, if he had in him a certain Proportion of Good, he should
be dispatched into heaven by a Passport from Pleasure, there to
dwell with Happiness, Virtue and the Gods.</italic></paragraph>
<paragraph>L.</paragraph>

<paragraph>1. Judges ix. 8-15.</paragraph>
<paragraph>2. Sam. xii. 1-4.</paragraph>
<paragraph>3. Livy, Bk. II. sec. 32.</paragraph>
<paragraph>4. Xenophon's Memorabilia Socratis, Bk. II.</paragraph>
<paragraph>5. Phaedon, &#167; 10.</paragraph>
<paragraph>6. [that]</paragraph>
</text>
</issue>
